Skip to content

Titus 3:5 — The Washing of Regeneration

The text. "He saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit." (ESV)

Greek: ouk ex ergōn tōn en dikaiosynē ha epoiēsamen hēmeis, alla kata to autou eleos, dia loutrou palingenesias kai anakainōseōs pneumatos hagiou.

The Calvinist reading

Titus 3:5 is one of the strongest texts in the Reformed case for monergistic regeneration, and it deserves serious treatment. Paul sets "works done by us in righteousness" against "his own mercy," and then names the mechanism: "the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit." On the Reformed reading, this is the new birth described as God's own act on a passive sinner. The sinner does not cooperate in being born; he is washed. Regeneration is therefore logically prior to faith: God gives the new heart, and the new heart believes.

Calvin's commentary on Titus reads the verse as proof that salvation is entirely of God's mercy, and that the "washing" is the Spirit's inward cleansing, not a human ritual. Hodge, Warfield, and Murray treat regeneration as the immediate, creative work of the Spirit that produces faith; Packer's Concise Theology states the same order plainly. Sproul made the priority of regeneration a cornerstone: the dead are made alive before they can respond.

The verse's force is real. Paul says "not because of works" and "according to his own mercy," and he describes salvation in the passive voice — we were washed, we were renewed. Anyone making salvation depend on the sinner's contribution must get past it.

The problems

1. The contrast is works versus mercy, not faith versus regeneration

Paul's negative is "not because of works done by us in righteousness" (ouk ex ergōn). That is the standard Pauline antithesis, and it recurs across the letters: "by works of the law no human being will be justified" (Rom 3:20); "to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness" (Rom 4:5); "not a result of works, so that no one may boast" (Eph 2:9); "not because of our works but because of his own purpose" (2 Tim 1:9). In each case the excluded thing is merit, not response.

Paul could have written "not by faith" if he had meant to exclude believing. He did not. The positive statement is "according to his own mercy," and the casebook affirms that with its whole heart: mercy is the ground of salvation, and no one earns it. But a text that excludes works does not thereby exclude faith — indeed Romans 4:5 puts faith and works in direct opposition, with faith on the side of grace.

2. The passage does not state an order of salvation

"Washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit" is a single compound phrase — one article governing both nouns, most naturally read as one event described twice: the cleansing that is the new birth, and the renewing that the Spirit works. It does not say "regeneration, then faith," and it does not say faith is the product of a prior washing. The order is supplied by a theological system, not by the syntax.

Where the New Testament does relate faith and new birth, it does not uniformly put regeneration first. John writes, "to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, who were born... of God" (John 1:12–13). Peter says believers have been "born again through the living and abiding word of God" — the word "that was preached to you" (1 Pet 1:23–25). James says God "brought us forth by the word of truth" (Jas 1:18). Ephesians 1:13 puts hearing and believing before sealing. The casebook does not deny that the Spirit's work is prior and enabling — John 6:44 and 16:8 are clear — but "prior" is not the same as "a completed regeneration that occurs before the sinner believes anything."

3. The washing imagery is prophetic, and the prophets call for response

Loutron means a bath, a washing. It appears only here and in Ephesians 5:26; its background is the prophetic promise of cleansing: "I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean... and I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you" (Ezek 36:25–26); "there shall be a fountain opened... to cleanse them from sin and uncleanness" (Zech 13:1).

That background is corporate, restorative, and promissory — and it sits in prophets who also command the response: "wash yourselves; make yourselves clean" (Isa 1:16); "make yourselves a new heart and a new spirit... For I have no pleasure in the death of anyone... so turn, and live" (Ezek 18:31–32). The same corpus that promises the cleansing commands the turning. Grace enables the turning; the cleansing does not happen to people who never turn.

4. The "pouring out" is Pentecost-shaped and universal in scope

Verse 6 continues: "whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior." The language echoes Joel 2:28–29 and its citation in Acts 2:17–18: "I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh." The same letter says that "the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people" (Titus 2:11). A decree that regenerates only some while the Spirit is poured out "on all flesh" is in tension with the letter's own framing.

The baptismal association of loutron is worth noting, though the casebook neither affirms baptismal regeneration nor denies that baptism is the sign of this washing. The imagery is initiatory and communal, not a description of an invisible transaction performed on an individual before he can hear.

5. Verse 7 says justification is "by his grace" — and Paul elsewhere says "by faith"

"So that being justified by his grace we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life" (3:7). Justification is grounded in grace. But Paul also says we are "justified by faith" (Rom 3:28; 5:1; Gal 2:16). The two are not rivals: grace is the source, faith the instrument. Titus 3:5–7 gives us the source and the washing; it does not give us a mechanism by which the instrument is bypassed.

And the letter's own sequel shows the order Paul cares about: "those who have believed in God may be careful to devote themselves to good works" (3:8). Belief comes first; good works follow — the opposite of works-righteousness.

The non-Calvinist reading

Salvation begins in the kindness and love of God, not in the competence of the sinner. God appeared, God had mercy, God washed, God renewed, God poured out his Spirit, God justified. The sinner brings nothing but need; the passage is a doxology to mercy.

The response God asks is repentance and faith — the turning the prophets commanded and the gospel enables. Grace precedes it, creates the possibility of it, and convicts the heart that resists it. But grace does not do the turning in the sinner's place, and Titus 3:5 does not say it does.

What this does and does not prove

It proves that salvation is not by works, that mercy is its ground, that the Spirit's cleansing is necessary, and that God takes the initiative at every point. It does not prove that regeneration precedes faith, because the text does not address the order, and because the same Paul who writes this verse also writes that we are "justified by faith."

What would count against this reading: if Paul had written "not by faith but by regeneration," or if he had described the washing as happening to those who never hear or respond. He does neither.

Further reading

  • John Calvin, Commentary on Titus, on 3:5 — the classic reading of the washing.
  • Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology, vol. 3, on regeneration — the monergistic account.
  • Philip H. Towner, The Letters to Timothy and Titus, NICNT (Eerdmans, 2006), on 3:4–7 — the prophetic background.
  • Leighton Flowers, The Potter's Promise (2014) — on regeneration and faith.

See also